Login

The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +comps.

Officially Licensed 3rd Party Developer Libraries
Free 3rd Party Programs

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby Cupwise » Mon May 20, 2013 2:49 am

i heard a rumor that cupwise might have the 660 in his sights, and maybe a c2... :mrgreen:
Cupwise
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:03 am

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby SWAN » Mon May 20, 2013 6:19 am

Cupwise wrote:i heard a rumor that cupwise might have the 660 in his sights, and maybe a c2... :mrgreen:


ooooh yeah...660...C2... 8-)

Wouldnt mind seeing the Hammer, and Gyratec...
Mac Mini i7 quad 2.6

Logic X
Live 9
Reaper
SWAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:16 pm

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby Metalblast » Mon May 20, 2013 2:26 pm

EQ: Drawmer 1961 !!!
Metalblast
User Level VI
User Level VI
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:00 pm

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby mmarra » Mon May 20, 2013 4:09 pm

cargolot wrote:SONTEC 462 or 432 (SS) (clean, invisible, musical)
(mastering legend. "gml with better highs". rumored it's already being done by popular developer)


If this is true it would be amazing :D
mmarra
User Level V
User Level V
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:53 pm

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby jeffbdavis » Mon May 20, 2013 4:27 pm

Cupwise wrote:i heard a rumor that cupwise might have the 660 in his sights, and maybe a c2... :mrgreen:


You tease! :D
User avatar
jeffbdavis
User Level VIII
User Level VIII
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 11:11 am

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby jeffbdavis » Mon May 20, 2013 4:39 pm

cargolot wrote:And here is a list of highly praised compressors neither available:

- Pendulum ES-8 (VM) (Clean)
- CraneSong STC-8 // tracker (vca sort of)
- Dave Hill Designs Titan (like crane or better)

- Fairman TMC (VM) ("I personally liked the TMC better for the mix buss and the EAR 660 on vocals(works great on acoustics also)

- EAR 660 (VM) (better than phoenix some say. Amazing on vocals)

- Dramastic Obsidian (VCA)
- Foote control systems P3S (VCA)
- vertigo (VCA)
- Smart C2 (VCA)
- A*I 2500 (VCA)

- C******r ltd-2 (nice color)

- Qes labs Variable Gm comp (VM)
- Gyraf Gyratec X (VM) (Clean)
- GML 2030 (transparent)
-Squeezebox ("amazing for vocals")

(more, no comments: TK Audio BC1 MK2, Rockruepel, Elysia (complex), distressor, Knif vari-mu, A****n 747)

_____________________________________________________

Any comments, comparations or aditions are welcome, specially if compared to the above and found better in some aspect.

If you hated any of the above and why is great info as well.

No need to remind us nebula isn't easily good at comps, thanks.


I'll cosign the A*I 2500 and C******r... and, I'll add a few to the wish list:

ADR Compex
Retro Sta-Level
Retro 176
Daking FET III
A*I 525
D*x 160X

Tim, are you listening?? :D
User avatar
jeffbdavis
User Level VIII
User Level VIII
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 11:11 am

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby SWAN » Mon May 20, 2013 8:36 pm

Metalblast wrote:EQ: Drawmer 1961 !!!


yeah Id like that....

Tim re 660 - can Nebula deal with its program dependent behaviour or can you sketch in the attack and release times in the program?
Mac Mini i7 quad 2.6

Logic X
Live 9
Reaper
SWAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:16 pm

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby Cupwise » Mon May 20, 2013 10:15 pm

SWAN wrote:
Metalblast wrote:EQ: Drawmer 1961 !!!


yeah Id like that....

Tim re 660 - can Nebula deal with its program dependent behaviour or can you sketch in the attack and release times in the program?


well i think maybe it could, but it's not specifically set up to do it. there isn't a program dependent section built in. but i think i could figure out a way to do it if i had more FUNs to play with than the 8 that are given, as i mentioned in my 'my requests' thread over in the requests sub-forum. i've asked giancarlo about getting more funs, and he says that they are processed even if they aren't used (the 8 that are there already), so adding more would mean adding more cpu use. but i don't see why he couldn't add them in such a way that only programs that want to use them have them 'activated'.

i think if i had access to maybe 10 more funs, i could add some program dependency and make the gain reduction meter a bit more accurate among other things. i think i've got gr meter to be fairly accurate- when there's gain reduction. but if the compression stops suddenly, the value hangs (all comps do this).

as it is, it MAY be possible but i don't like thinking about it because it would mean sacrificing something almost surely. the hardware i used for 609 has 2 release settings that are automatic, and rayphlex hardware has an auto mode, and i think the slick hardware does too. i took measurements/recordings of this stuff as best as i could so that one day if i figure out how to do it i could go back and add it in. i consider most or even all of my stuff to be a work in progress when i release it, and anyone who buys my stuff knows that i update a lot of it with new things. i'd still like to be able to figure out how to add a 'bias' control to my lfo sets (custom tremolo and youreib) and one day maybe i'll figure it out and do it. so the 660, if i do that, it probably won't have the prog dependence on release, but it may get added eventually. or maybe i'll actually buckle down and see what i can do before the initial release, where it might make more of an impact.
Last edited by Cupwise on Mon May 20, 2013 10:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cupwise
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:03 am

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby ssaxamaphone » Mon May 20, 2013 10:21 pm

I would love someone to do the hammer!
ssaxamaphone
User Level I
User Level I
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:21 am

Re: The best EQualizers not done yet (sontec, buzz, ...) +co

Postby Cupwise » Mon May 20, 2013 10:24 pm

ssaxamaphone wrote:I would love someone to do the hammer!

ha i love your username btw. classic. sometimes i forget that the show used to be GOOD (great even).
Cupwise
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:03 am

Next

Return to 3rd party libraries

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

cron