I have a credit with AITB for one library and I was thinking of picking up one of these comps. I'm totally new to nebula's comps, so I just thought I would get some opinions on these from know a thing or two. Thoughts? Better worse, than other nebula comps?
I could get an eq, but the only one I don't have from AITB is the germanos series. I'm not sure I need more eq's.
i use snap-compressor a lot. it does what the name implies and gives some nice body to the sound. you have to take time to learn the behaviour of this library, but i find it very useful on a lot of instruments and busses.
i got very nice results as a parallel-comp. this way you can push the distortion a little, without destroying the overall sound.
system 1: windows 8 32 bit - samplitude prox/x3, tracktion6/7, reaper system 2: mac osx yosemite - reaper(32+64bit), tracktion6/7(32+64bit)
both systems on: macbook pro (late 2009), core 2 duo 3,06 ghz, 4 gb ram, graphic: nvidia geforce 9600M GT 512 MB
vicnestE wrote:Fate compressor has no adjustable attack, but it sounds thick and warm.
I found that it's still useful even more advanced compressor programs released by other developers.
But I do want the Fate compressor at 96KHz with adjustable attack.
I don't know much about how NAT works, but since the N**e model being sampled for the Fate program has no variable attack how could they create a Nebula version of that compressor *with* variable attack? You can only sample what the actual hardware can do, yes?