as the name implies (...mastering...), it is very transparent, not much colouring going on.
to my ears, it acts on transients and adds a kind of dimension to the sound, all very subtle.
try increasing input and drive, to get it to act more hearable.
i use it for finalizing mixes, that should be clear and open, but need a little compact feeling and punch. as said this is very subtle.
the effect of this library is more prominent, when you use the inputprograms on tracks, plus the output on busses or masterbus. here i hear a better separation of soundsources, while at the same time they glue together in a good way.
have fun experimenting, mathias
p.s. the eq of this library is great, i love it!
system 1: windows 8 32 bit - samplitude prox/x3, tracktion6/7, reaper system 2: mac osx yosemite - reaper(32+64bit), tracktion6/7(32+64bit)
both systems on: macbook pro (late 2009), core 2 duo 3,06 ghz, 4 gb ram, graphic: nvidia geforce 9600M GT 512 MB
I have tried pushing the input up until I can start to hear the artifacting, bringing the output level down accordingly - but I still think, as you say, it is very subtle. I really need to listen to the Input/Output nice and loud but my 5 month old Son is always asleep it would seem And my AKG K240 headphones are really not up to the task. I have to grab time on speakers when I can get it!
Yes, I really like the EQ too Nice top end, I have not tried to work with the bass end much yet.
Of course you are right It's quite impossible to judge width on headphones - they are just too linear.
I think the EQ is beautiful, but perhaps the input/output stages are way too subtle for my usage. If there is subtle width/depth being added then cool, I need to look into that further and explore the possibilities there. Currently, after testing on some decent monitors (albeit at low volume) I still was unable to detect any change in character with the material I test it with. It's VERY subtle
Maybe I need, instead, the in/out on your classic blue model combined with the EQ from the GMC.
Would you say that the input/output stages on MBC, MTC, MWC, CLC, VBC and MLC were more characterful and less subtle than those of the GMC?
My problem is that I can hear every little change as 1/2m of microphone cable added, so for me nothing is so transparent at the sound. In mastering I prefer to not use any input console but only the Mixbuss by GMC with his eQ. VBC, MBC, MTC and MWC are more coloured since they are mixing console but generally a good console is without color that untouch the sound, this is the main goal of the constructors. If you look at colors it's better to use preamps.
However this winter I have recapped this console with better caps (rare Rubycon instead Nichicon and Panasonic) and the sound has been improved in depth and width and a little in details. I think to resample the whole console in the next month: input, eQ, compressor, mixbuss.
at Yamaha HS50M with HS10W you can really hear difference for any of Alexb library preset(consoles,preamps..), GMC is great, add 4db of 40hz (if your mix lacks bass of course) and bass gets separated and augmented in such a pleasant way.
Tested all consoles (from alexb demo listening room) at Genelec 1038 and they differ even more on those monitors.
AlexB wrote:However this winter I have recapped this console with better caps (rare Rubycon instead Nichicon and Panasonic) and the sound has been improved in depth and width and a little in details. I think to resample the whole console in the next month: input, eQ, compressor, mixbuss.
Hi AlexB ... are you speaking of the GMC console to be resampled ??