Tips & tricks, working results, technical support

Re: N4

Postby flipnaut » Tue Jun 21, 2016 7:00 pm

at jfer: i hope they will wait until new Website and auth tool is out!

btw. i would call neb4 just Aqua :D
Studio One on Intel i7 4790k.
Aquas i like are: Lime, Gold, Pink2412, Amethyst2, Honey
User avatar
Posts: 716
Joined: Sat May 18, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Germany, Düsseldorf

Re: N4

Postby spunkmuffin » Tue Jun 21, 2016 11:21 pm

flipnaut wrote:at jfer: i hope they will wait until new Website and auth tool is out!

+++1 ;)
User Level VI
User Level VI
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 10:55 pm

Re: N4

Postby fatbwif » Tue Jul 05, 2016 2:15 pm

So... We are now in july... Any news about Nebula 4 ?
What is the current target release date (approx.) ?
What is your actual product timeline ?

User Level 0
User Level 0
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:24 pm

Re: N4

Postby BCz » Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:33 pm

Hello there folks. I'm really interested in buying Nebula 3 but I've been holding off until 4 drops. Since it's been a while since it was announced and there appears to be no clear sign of when it'll be releasing I might just buy the 3 Pro Bundle.

If I decide to take the plunge and buy Nebula 3, will I have the option to upgrade to 4 when it releases or will I have to pay full price?

User Level III
User Level III
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:04 am

Re: N4

Postby giancarlo » Thu Jul 07, 2016 10:12 am

yes there will be an upgrade plan. N4 will be released this year, but we don't know exactly the timeframe yet.
We are running
User avatar
Posts: 10816
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:40 pm
Location: Italy

Re: N4

Postby BCz » Thu Jul 07, 2016 4:42 pm

I see, thanks. I just went ahead and bought the Server Ultimate Bundle and will wait eagerly for the release of Neb 4.

User Level III
User Level III
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:04 am

Re: N4

Postby reggiejaxx » Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:28 pm

Neb 4 delay again?... thought it was june-july....no approx realease date ..i'm guessing it's not priority, though i was looking forward to it, guess i'll check back in a few months.
User Level X
User Level X
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:09 am

Re: N4

Postby THAPRODUCERZ » Wed Jul 13, 2016 10:50 pm

I imagine the new technologies used in the newest Acqua plugins caused a rework of N4. Better to have it right than rushed
ITB: i7-4770 3.4ghz, 32GB Ram, Windows 10, Nebula 3 Server Ultimate,GOLD, Amethyst 2, Pink,Pro-tools 11, Cubase LE 8, Reaper 4, Fl-studio 12, Komplete 10 ultimate,i also have a need for authentic analog tone

User avatar
User Level XI
User Level XI
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:29 am
Location: The Planet I Am

Re: N4

Postby Support » Fri Jul 15, 2016 12:19 pm

THAPRODUCERZ wrote:I imagine the new technologies used in the newest Acqua plugins caused a rework of N4. Better to have it right than rushed

Both products line-up, Nebula and Acqua Effects use the same Acqua/Nebula framework. Acqua Effect assembly/routing should work in the Acqua Effect itself and also in Nebula4, but we need to check it one by one in order to provide our customer a full working product.
Best regards,
Enrique Silveti.
Acustica Audio customer and technical support
User avatar
Posts: 3218
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:33 am
Location: Lodi, Lombardia, Italy.

Re: N4

Postby greekpeet » Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:21 pm


Let's talk about the GUI.

I'm going to be super harsh, but so honest.


They will be (and all the other 'gear centric' styled GUI's), completely and totally laughed at within a few years time.

It's a gimmick that has so long ran its course.

How much development is actually spent on skinning and GUI that could be spent on the audio side? How many support layers is the company digging into with various OS requirements for that?

Can we just get simple, clean, scalable, vector based graphics layer and forget about trying to make it look like hardware?

Trying to get software to look like hardware, MAKES IT HARDER TO USE!

Not only that, increases the lines of code required to support a massive backdrop, tying tiny little pictures to the GUI, and wrapping all that to another OS's specs for displaying it on your computer screen.

Does that make sense? Lot's of extra and unnecessary resources are spent on something that doesn't enhance the audio in any shape or way, and pigeon holes the user experience.

Plus it completely dates the technology.

Knobs on hardware make sense, not in software.
I don't want a knob that has beautiful 3d shading.

I want a knob or slider that is clear to look at, and scalable depending on how large or small of a screen I'm working off of.

Cool thing about this system, it should be very easy on the user front to customize their preferable GUI. Instead of having this walled garden (having a user need NAT, scripting languages, etc) to change the basic interface layout.

This is such a requirement due to the huge variety of libraries out there.

I'd kill for a Valhalla slash 21st century NASA computer vector based graphic system for Nebula.

FL Studio and H******* Mixbus pulled it off.

Clean, flat, scalable, simple, user-friendly.

That stuff will be classy for decades to come, and much easier to support.
User Level XI
User Level XI
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:28 pm


Return to Working with Nebula

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests