Login

Using 96 kHz or 44,1 kHz reverbs in 48 kHz project?

Tips & tricks, working results, technical support

Using 96 kHz or 44,1 kHz reverbs in 48 kHz project?

Postby dagovitsj » Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:33 am

Hi!
I'm usually working in 44,1 kHz, but right now I'm working with a mix in 48 kHz. I'm using VNXT's EMT140 (44,1 kHz) and EAR Room and Hall (96 kHz). But would it be better to run EAR Room and Hall in 44,1 kHz too or is there any sound/quality differences (or other things I should consider?) when I'm using a 44,1 kHz or 96 kHz lib in a project setting of 48 kHz?

Bottom line: is there any rule of thumb regarding this or what?

Cheers
|Win 7-64bit | Reaper 4. x64, Cubase 6.5.3., 64 & 32 bit | RAM:16 GB | CPU: Intel Core i5 760@ 2,8 GHz | Samsung SSD 830 (256 GB) | WD: Black harddisks | Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Graphics Accelerator | Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4 |Nebula 3 Pro |
dagovitsj
Vip Member
Vip Member
 
Posts: 497
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:25 pm

Re: Using 96 kHz or 44,1 kHz reverbs in 48 kHz project?

Postby yr » Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:45 pm

I prefer the 44.1 to 48 conversion over the down-sampled 96khz presets. You should test it though- you may find the difference to be negligible.
Reuven | post-production & sound-design | scenography |
website | nebula presets
User avatar
yr
Beta Tester
Beta Tester
 
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:04 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Using 96 kHz or 44,1 kHz reverbs in 48 kHz project?

Postby dagovitsj » Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:38 pm

Thanks, yr!
I'll do a test when I get some spare time.

Cheers
|Win 7-64bit | Reaper 4. x64, Cubase 6.5.3., 64 & 32 bit | RAM:16 GB | CPU: Intel Core i5 760@ 2,8 GHz | Samsung SSD 830 (256 GB) | WD: Black harddisks | Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Graphics Accelerator | Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4 |Nebula 3 Pro |
dagovitsj
Vip Member
Vip Member
 
Posts: 497
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:25 pm


Return to Working with Nebula

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests