Login

CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Tips & tricks, working results, technical support

CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby blandry » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:43 am

Hello. I'm running 499n Nebula 2 and want to get an idea of the cpu savings I would get upgrading to Neb 3 Pro.
Kind Regards,
B
blandry
User Level VI
User Level VI
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:07 am

Re: CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby blandry » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:27 pm

Bump. Anybody know?
blandry
User Level VI
User Level VI
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:07 am

Re: CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby woeischris » Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:56 pm

At the risk of sounding rude, why does it matter? You will get a performance boost and you will be able to correctly use every library. As it stands, you're not getting the peak performance, so why do you bother?
woeischris
Member
Member
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:06 am

Re: CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby blandry » Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:48 am

Limited funds. Trying to decide whether to upgrade my processor or go for 3 pro. And yes, that sounded pretty rude.
blandry
User Level VI
User Level VI
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:07 am

Re: CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby woeischris » Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:42 pm

Sorry, dude, kinda just how I see it.

What processor do you have, what would you be upgrading to? A faster processor will let you do EVERYTHING better. If you think that you need a new processor, any version of Nebula is going to be difficult to use. I started with 3 Pro and could seriously only do two instances of the most basic programs at a time. If I hadn't moved to an i7, I would have had to stop using it altogether.
woeischris
Member
Member
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:06 am

Re: CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby Mplay » Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:48 pm

Nebula 3 free uses the same engine as Nebula pro. You could run some tests and find out

@woeischris. Our posts per day ratio is always very close :)
Mplay
Member
Member
 
Posts: 275
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:25 am
Location: Willemstad, Curaçao

Re: CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby richie43 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:31 pm

Mplay wrote:Nebula 3 free uses the same engine as Nebula pro. You could run some tests and find out



But I thought that Nebula Pro 3 Server was the only one using the Core 3. I have a decent quad core, and my Nebula performance got a huge boost when I finally upgraded into the server version. The newest experimental version has been the best so far. I am having pretty good performance without an "i" series quad, although that would obviously be best. my Q8400 quad is still miles ahead of any dual core and I can use up to 15 HEAVY console instances, or well over 25 regular lower kernel presets.
The Sounds of the Hear and Now
http://soundyaudio.com/
richie43
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4857
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:47 pm
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby Mplay » Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:24 pm

I don't think blandry was considering the server version, but you're right about Nebula server being fastest with it's core 3 engine. Nebula 3 pro and Nebula 3 free still use core 2 engine, so should be comparable.
Mplay
Member
Member
 
Posts: 275
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:25 am
Location: Willemstad, Curaçao

Re: CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby woeischris » Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:35 am

I do believe that Pro performs better than Free.
woeischris
Member
Member
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:06 am

Re: CPU usage difference between Neb 2 and Neb 3 Pro

Postby blandry » Mon Aug 01, 2011 3:37 am

Big thanks for the info everybody, much appreciated.

I have a core 2 duo and can run 5 or 6 instances of the high kernal stuff, 12 or 13 of the low kernal.

I would be upgrading to a Q series quad like the one richie43 is running. I'm thinking maybe I should do this first and then go to 3 Pro or Server...

Man Nebula sounds good, I'm still blown away even though I can't use the latest compressors....yet!

p.s. 499n version Neb 2 (coreI) performs about as well for me as the 5 month old Neb 3 Free (coreII) did. That's kind of where my question was coming from, if that makes sense.
blandry
User Level VI
User Level VI
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:07 am

Next

Return to Working with Nebula

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest