Has compression just got better???

Tips & tricks, working results, technical support

Re: Has compression just got better???

Postby enriquesilveti » Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:42 pm

Nebula2/3 > COREI
Nebula3PRO/Server > COREII
Enrique Silveti.
Acustica Audio customer and technical support.

MBP 11.5 (i7-4870 | 16 GB | 512 SSD)
SP4 (i5-6300 | 8 GB | 256 SSD)
UFX | Lyra2 | USBPre2
VM U15 | VM Win10 | VM OSX 10.12
N4/NAT4 | SPX3 | RX5 | LN2C | Smaart8 | R5 | PT12 | PX10 | NIK5
User avatar
Posts: 2827
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:00 pm
Location: Lodi | Madrid | Buenos Aires

Re: Has compression just got better???

Postby yr » Sat Jun 11, 2011 6:59 pm

timp wrote:I tried the evf 17 on old libarys seems to work nice . But don't know if its closer.It sounds tighter, more attack.But the prog rate needs to be changed to capture the fast attacks. I've been told not to change xml because of aliasing . but I allways have a copy of a xml set to 250 on prog rate if i need it.

Looking foward to cld that will be tuned to evf 17.


I tried it out with the DME 1968 STD/250 rate and the shortest attack I get is about 20ms. It does sound better then I remember and seems to give much more consistent compression.

EDIT: I repeated the test with the side-chain version of the same preset, and now I'm getting much faster minimal attack times- 4ms. I wonder what is the reason for the difference...
Reuven | post-production & sound-design | scenography |
website | nebula presets
User avatar
Beta Tester
Beta Tester
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:04 am
Location: Amsterdam


Return to Working with Nebula

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bjarneda and 5 guests