biomuse wrote:I'm a little unclear on what part of
We rebuild the EVF module, now Nebula react better in attack and release
you don't understand.
That could not possibly mean anything other than that the behavior of the compressors has changed at least slightly. If they were invisible changes to the EVF module, why would they have made them and announced them?
Wow, thanks for clearing that up. That's pretty bad. Now we have to keep a backup of 1.3.478 to be backwards-compatible with current mixes. Well, I guess it's the tradeoff for using bleeding-edge technology
Mercado_Negro wrote:If you don't change anything in the EVFS page of programs then the sound shouldn't change at all. People in most threads are talking about changing the metering in the MAST page which, as you pointed out, is a completely different thing. Old compressors use RMS 17 or AVR 17, if I recall correctly. New compressors will use EVF 17. As far as I know, and please correct me if I'm wrong, the old envelope followers (Average, Peak, RMS, Average 17 and RMS 17) did not change to preserve the behavior/sound of old sessions/projects. That's why we have new envelope followers.
There has been at least as much, and likely more, discussion/complaining about the actual performance of the compressors as there has been about metering.
Enrique's response was to a direct question in the OP about sound, not metering. So it's possible that we're wrong and the sound is the same, but that would be surprising at this point given these facts.
it makes no sense they would build a brand new EVF for new compressors then change the old one!
i think it is a languge confusion.
could giancarlo please straighten this out? are the old compressors going to sound the same?
also, how is the new EVF better than the old one, what should we be listening for? is the problem of the program rate needing to be very high to stop random attack times and enable fast attacks addressed?
I tried the evf 17 on old libarys seems to work nice . But don't know if its closer.It sounds tighter, more attack.But the prog rate needs to be changed to capture the fast attacks. I've been told not to change xml because of aliasing . but I allways have a copy of a xml set to 250 on prog rate if i need it.
Looking foward to cld that will be tuned to evf 17.